Blog Posts

Patient Visuals in Turkish Health Tourism: Approval Guide

Patient Visuals in Turkish Health Tourism: Approval Guide
Çağla Güvelioğlu
Çağla Güvelioğlu
Contents

What makes a patient photo safe to publish?

A patient photo needs a documented release check, not just a signed form. The team must check permission, the image itself, the wording and the audience. If any of those change, the earlier decision may no longer fit.

Picture a clinic preparing a post for people abroad. The patient has agreed to one photo, and the doctor has checked the caption. Then someone turns on an ad setting that widens the audience to include Türkiye. The final post now differs from the plan that the team reviewed.

This is why the useful question is specific: can we publish this image, with these words, on this account today? A message saying “looks fine” cannot answer it. Each person should know which part they checked and where the evidence sits.

Türkiye's health service promotion and information regulation of 12 November 2025 sets the legal framework. Article 7 covers visual content; Article 8 sets special terms for health tourism aimed abroad. Those terms are not a blanket exemption from the other rules.

This guide offers a work process, not legal or medical advice. Use it with the clinic's legal team and a qualified clinical lead. Rules in the target country also need review; permission in Türkiye does not settle every overseas use.

What should the consent file actually show?

The consent file should show which image the patient agreed to and how the team plans to use it. Explicit consent means a free, informed choice about a specific use. A signature has limited practical value if no one can link it to the final photo.

The regulation provides for written or electronic consent through its Annex 1 form. It also gives the patient the right to see the visual before it is shared. Build that right into the workflow: show the chosen image, the caption and the planned channel together.

  • Person: Check who gives permission and whether a parent or guardian is needed.
  • Image: Link the raw file, chosen frame and release version to one record.
  • Use: State the purpose, language, market, account and planned period of use.
  • Preview: Record which version the patient saw, and when they saw it.
  • Contact: Name the person who will handle a request to stop sharing.

This checklist supports the official form; it does not replace it. Use a case code rather than putting a patient's name in every shared filename. Limit access to people who need the record for their role.

A patient may agree to a website photo but not to a paid ad. Do not treat the first answer as permission for every later use. A new caption or channel needs a fresh check against the recorded scope.

The patient must be told that refusing permission will not change diagnosis, treatment or charges. Payment, gifts and discounts in return for image permission are not allowed. The care team should never frame agreement as a favour the patient owes.

Check understanding, not just whether a box was ticked. If the patient needs a translation, review whether it conveys the same scope and right to withdraw. Leave time for questions without linking the answer to the next care appointment.

How do you keep before-and-after images fair?

Before-and-after photos must use the same setting and technical conditions. The regulation also requires the procedure date and the dates of the images. Two photos placed side by side do not, by themselves, make a fair comparison.

Light and camera angle can change what a viewer sees. A different lens, pose or expression can also make the outcome look better. Plan the first shoot so that the second can repeat its conditions.

  • Camera: Record the lens, height, distance and angle.
  • Light: Match the source, direction and settings.
  • Pose: Check gaze, expression and body position.
  • Dates: Verify the procedure date and both shoot dates.
  • Files: Keep the original captures and a record of any later processing.

The rule bars later technological changes or corrections to visual content. Do not narrow this to a ban only on edits that exaggerate results. Skin smoothing, reshaping and AI completion are not choices for a design team to approve on its own.

Do not assume that resizing or changing file format creates a legal exception either. Agree on any needed delivery process with the legal and clinical teams before release. An image looking natural is not proof that its use complies.

Hands reviewing abstract portrait cards beside a camera and colour samples
A staged visual review scene; the portraits do not show real patients or treatment results.

Not every health story needs a patient image. A clinician can explain research, the limits of a finding or the questions patients should ask. FL PR's Acıbadem communications case study describes this expert-source approach.

Evidence: Healthline's report of 9 November 2025 includes comments from Acıbadem doctor Metin Çakmakçı. It is an original editorial expert contribution, not a patient-image consent record. The coverage alone proves neither treatment success nor growth in patient numbers.

What changes when the audience is outside Türkiye?

Overseas use needs its own channel and audience checks; an English caption is not enough. The special rules apply within the scope of health tourism authorisation. Confirm the facility's or intermediary's role before choosing which provisions apply.

Article 8 calls for a separate social account or website aimed abroad. It must clearly state that services are offered within health tourism, and display the relevant authorisation document. Targeting people living in Türkiye to create demand is prohibited.

Domestic targeting cannot be selected on social platforms, and automatic audience definitions must be disabled. Save the actual settings, not just the campaign brief. Check again after an agency handover or a change to the ad account.

The general visual rules restrict paid promotion and require comments, likes and resharing to be closed. Article 8 contains specific overseas provisions, including conditions for sponsored visuals in official languages other than Turkish. Read the exceptions narrowly with legal counsel; other provisions still apply where no exception is given.

Authorised health facilities may use patient stories and reviews on the overseas channel under the stated conditions. These include documented explicit consent, privacy and patient rights. Also check the required HealthTürkiye logo and the match between the facility's licensed identity and website address.

An intermediary is not a health facility and must not present itself as one. Do not copy a facility's permissions directly into the intermediary's plan. The role stated on the page must match the service the business is allowed to provide.

The story around the photo matters too. A person travelling for care may need clear facts about records, contact points and follow-up. Do not assume that everyone in one country has the same concerns.

FL PR's Liv Hospital scientific collaboration case study offers a second useful signal. Its narrative links clinical expertise, academic ties and patient safety. This is the agency's account of its work, not independent proof of patient outcomes.

Who should make the final release decision?

The final owner should release the image only after each named reviewer has completed their check. One person's approval must not stand in for the whole process. Use a short record that makes missing evidence visible.

  • Authority: Legal checks the organisation's role and the rules for this use.
  • Consent: The patient-rights lead matches permission to the final image.
  • Accuracy: A qualified health professional checks the visual and medical wording.
  • Channel: The publishing team checks the account, language, market and ad settings.
  • Removal: The file owner confirms who can find and remove each copy.

These are suggested roles, not a claim that every clinic has the same structure. A small team can combine roles, but it must not lose a check. Missing consent or audience evidence means stop, even when the post is due.

If the image, text or audience changes after review, reopen the relevant check. Record who changed it and why. Avoid two files both called “final”; clear version numbers reduce the risk of sending the wrong one.

Measure the process as well as reach. Count files with missing permission, corrections after release and copies whose owners cannot be found. Use those findings to improve training and file control, not to claim clinical quality.

What must happen when permission is withdrawn?

A withdrawal request must be processed and concluded immediately. The regulation does not make that duty depend on the end of a campaign. An internal target must not become a waiting period.

Stop active ads and queued posts as soon as the request arrives. Start removing live copies at the same time. Use the case code to find the website image, social posts, ad versions and agency-held files.

If another party controls a copy, contact its owner at once and record the response. Do not report removal as complete while a known copy remains live. Escalate any access problem promptly through the appropriate legal and platform routes.

Tell the patient what has stopped, what has been removed and what remains unresolved. Keep any legally required record separate from public use. The purpose of the reply is to give a clear status, not to argue against the request.

Test the handover before a real case arrives. Can a colleague find the copies when the usual file owner is away? FL PR's wider health tourism communications guidance puts these practical steps within a patient-trust approach.

Frequently Asked Questions

These answers cover common release decisions for patient images used in health tourism.

Is verbal permission enough to share a patient photo?

Do not rely on verbal permission alone. The regulation provides for written or electronic consent using its Annex 1 form. Match the record to the image and planned use.

Can we edit a photo if it still looks natural?

Natural appearance is not the test. The rule bars later technological changes or corrections. Seek legal and clinical review of the delivery process rather than inventing an exception.

Does English copy make a post an overseas campaign?

No. Check the separate channel, authorisation, target market and automatic audience settings. Language alone does not show who receives the post.

Does using an agency remove the clinic's responsibility?

No. Sharing through another party does not remove the facility's or relevant health professional's responsibility. A clear agency agreement supports the process but does not replace the legal duties.

Can we wait 24 hours before removing an old post?

This guide grants no such waiting period. The request must be processed and concluded immediately. Start stopping distribution and removing copies at once.